Parent aren't: Law
says they can be liable for parties
By David McLaughlin / News Staff Writer
Sunday, June 6, 2004
Like teenagers everywhere, Chris Speck decided to throw a party one
Friday night. When too many kids showed up with too much beer, Speck
quickly found himself explaining things to police.
But what made the situation uncommon was that his mom, who was home
during the party, wound up in her own legal trouble.
The Hopkinton woman will be ordered to appear in court because she gave
the teens a place to get drunk, police say. The party was the second
such incident in Hopkinton this year in which parents have faced
criminal charges following a party at their home.
"It wasn't some shift in policy or a lighting bolt of, 'Oh, here's an
idea,'" said Hopkinton Police Chief Tom Irvin about cracking down on
parents who host teen parties. "This seemed like an appropriate statue
to apply to a problem. It seems like another way to reduce instances of
underage drinking, and that's the ultimate goal."
With graduation season in full swing and families throwing parties to
celebrate, police around MetroWest are issuing a warning: Parents will
no longer be prosecuted just for giving booze to minors. Simply being at
home while teens drink there will also get them in trouble under new
legislation passed a few years ago. It's a change in state law that
police say they are putting to use.
"Having (the law) at our disposal now is a tool to discourage this kind
of thing. Us and other departments are using that," said Holliston
Police Lt. Keith Edison.
In early May, police charged a Holliston mother with letting teens drink
at her home. She will be summoned to court next month.
"It's not something that will be tolerated," Edison said.
The enforcement may seem heavy-handed to some parents who argue their
kids are going to drink anyway so they might as well give them a safe
place to do it. It's an argument many parents make, police say. In fact,
Karen Speck, the mother involved in the recent Hopkinton party,
collected car keys from kids when they showed up to her house, according
to police.
Speck, along with other parents who have been similarly charged, could
not be reached for comment this week.
While state law does allow a parent to let their child drink at home,
they cannot let other kids do the same. And besides facing criminal
charges for hosting a party, parents can also be hit with stiff civil
penalties.
State Rep. Frank Hynes, D-Marshfield, passed legislation in 2000
requiring party hosts to stop underage drinking in their presence. The
bill followed the drunk driving death of a Marshfield teen who graduated
from Thayer Academy, Hynes said. He had gone to a graduation party in
Cohasset, where the parents of the home were present. He drove home late
at night and died.
Hynes rejected the argument from some parents that allowing teens to
drink at home in the presence of adults is a way to keep an eye on them.
"What message are we sending to young people -- we break some laws and
obey others?" he asked.
In another Hopkinton case, the parents denied knowing anything about the
underage drinking going on at their daughter's party. But David Yas,
editor of Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, said that argument is unlikely
to stand up in court. And police involved in several of these cases
around MetroWest say there is no way the parents could not have known
there were minors drinking at their homes.
"I wouldn't want to be a parent in court and argue there was this bash
going on at my house and I didn't know anything about it. You run the
risk of sounding disingenuous," Yas said.
In criminal cases, parents who are found guilty under the social host
law can be fined up to $2,000 and be imprisoned for up to a year. Of the
handful of recent cases in MetroWest surveyed by the News, only one has
gone to court. The others are still pending.
That case, from Hopkinton, was ruled on by a clerk magistrate, said
Irvin, but the police chief declined to reveal the outcome of the
hearing, citing criminal records laws. He added, however, that though he
could not talk about the case, the parents were not necessarily found
innocent.
Even if a parent can beat criminal penalties, they may face a civil
lawsuit if there's an accident or even death resulting from alcohol
consumed at their party. Yas warned that parents can be sued under
theory of law called social host liability, even if a party is held at
their home when they are not there. Civil cases, he said, are also
easier to prove because the burden of proof is less than in criminal
cases.
"Juries are more reluctant to throw someone in jail for sloppiness than
they are to impose a money penalty for sloppiness," he said.
Like other MetroWest communities, Wayland is grappling with parents
turning a blind eye to teen drinking. Police say they prosecute parents
as a way of "sending a message to the community that we're serious,"
said Wayland's youth officer, Jim Forti.
Just last week, a mother and her 19-year-old son were charged with
providing a place for minors to drink and keeping a disorderly house, he
said.
But the town is taking another approach to the problem in addition to
legal enforcement. Parents are being encouraged to sign a Safe Homes
pledge in which they promise to supervise teen parties at their home;
not to serve alcohol to minors or allow them to drink; and to welcome
calls from other parents whose children have been invited to the home.
More than 160 parents have signed the pledge.
Parent Donna Hale, who has two children in high school, said she did not
hesitate to sign it.
"I have no intention of ever providing alcohol to a minor. I want other
parents to know that, so they know that they know that they can have
their children at my home and feel safe," she said.
Reaction to the Safe Homes pledge has been good, said Forti. But he said
some parents have resisted signing because they think teen drinking is
normal or that their kids need to learn how to drink before going to
college.
That's an attitude Hale rejects.
"That just feeds into the whole idea that this is a rite of passage, and
I don't think it has to be. Kids can have fun and socialize and alcohol
doesn't have to be a part of it. And furthermore, it's against the law
right now," she said.
Back to articles